SQLAlchemy, Array_agg, And Matching An Input List
Solution 1:
I think your solution would produce indeterminate results, because the rows within a group are in unspecified order, and so the comparison between the array aggregate and given array may produce true or false based on that:
[local]:5432 u@sopython*=> select group_id
[local] u@sopython- > from multi_groups
[local] u@sopython- > group by group_id
[local] u@sopython- > having array_agg((atom_id, sequence)) = ARRAY[(1,3),(2,2),(3,1)];
group_id
----------
2
(1 row)
[local]:5432 u@sopython*=> update multi_groups set atom_id = atom_id where atom_id = 2;
UPDATE 2
[local]:5432 u@sopython*=> select group_id
from multi_groups
group by group_id
having array_agg((atom_id, sequence)) = ARRAY[(1,3),(2,2),(3,1)];
group_id
----------
(0 rows)
You could apply an ordering to both, or try something entirely different: instead of array comparison you could use relational division.
In order to divide you have to form a temporary relation from your list of Entity
records. Again, there are many ways to approach that. Here's one using unnested arrays:
In [112]: vtm = select([
...: func.unnest(postgresql.array([
...: getattr(e, f) for e in values_to_match
...: ])).label(f)
...: for f in Entity._fields
...: ]).alias()
And another using a union:
In [114]: vtm = union_all(*[
...: select([literal(e.atom_id).label('atom_id'),
...: literal(e.sequence).label('sequence')])
...: for e in values_to_match
...: ]).alias()
A temporary table would do as well.
With the new relation at hand you want to find the answer to "find those multi_groups
for which no entity exists that is not in the group". It's a horrible sentence, but makes sense:
In [117]: mg = aliased(MultiColumnGroups)
In [119]: session.query(MultiColumnGroups.group_id).\
...: filter(~exists().
...: select_from(vtm).
...: where(~exists().
...: where(MultiColumnGroups.group_id == mg.group_id).
...: where(tuple_(vtm.c.atom_id, vtm.c.sequence) ==
...: tuple_(mg.atom_id, mg.sequence)).
...: correlate_except(mg))).\
...: distinct().\
...: all()
...:
Out[119]: [(2)]
On the other hand you could also just select the intersection of groups with the given entities:
In [19]: gs = intersect(*[
...: session.query(MultiColumnGroups.group_id).
...: filter(MultiColumnGroups.atom_id == vtm.atom_id,
...: MultiColumnGroups.sequence == vtm.sequence)
...: for vtm in values_to_match
...: ])
In [20]: session.execute(gs).fetchall()
Out[20]: [(2,)]
The error
ProgrammingError: (psycopg2.ProgrammingError) operator does not exist: record[] = integer[]
LINE 3: ...gg((multi_groups.atom_id, multi_groups.sequence)) = ARRAY[AR...
^
HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You might need to add explicit type casts.
[SQL: 'SELECT multi_groups.group_id AS multi_groups_group_id \nFROM multi_groups GROUP BY multi_groups.group_id \nHAVING array_agg((multi_groups.atom_id, multi_groups.sequence)) = %(array_agg_1)s'] [parameters: {'array_agg_1': [[1, 3], [2, 2], [3, 1]]}] (Background on this error at: http://sqlalche.me/e/f405)
is a result of how your values_to_match
is first converted to a list of lists (for reasons unknown) and then converted to an array by your DB-API driver. It results in an array of array of integer, not an array of record (int, int). Using a raw DB-API connection and cursor, passing a list of tuples works as you'd expect.
In SQLAlchemy if you wrap the list values_to_match
with sqlalchemy.dialects.postgresql.array()
, it works as you meant it to work, though remember that the results are indeterminate.
Post a Comment for "SQLAlchemy, Array_agg, And Matching An Input List"